AFI talks to David Kesting, Co-Director, Fountain Miami
November 15th, 2007
Art Fairs International: The galleries behind Fountain are an intensely independent group. You’ve been described as “in-your-face,” and the name “Fountain” is derived from the name of the audacious readymade by Marcel Duchamp. All of these metaphors make me ask, where is your Fountain Manifesto?
David Kesting: We never wrote it. Fountain was a reaction to where we—Capla Kesting Fine Art, McCaig-Welles, and Front Room—were when we started Fountain NY 2006. I would rather see our goals achieved then spend time writing a doctrine of how we are supposed to act. What if that doctrine becomes outdated, or we no longer agree to what its goals are? I think the purpose of the Fountain Art Fair is to create leverage for the independent gallery and dealer against the traditional art fair. When we started in 2006, none of the art fairs wanted anything to do with us. We couldn’t even get accepted into their fairs, much less come up with the money needed to rent a booth. Now we are on a first-name basis with a number of the people who run these fairs, and we have venues to solicit the clientele who support the contemporary art market in these hotbeds of contemporary art. All that gives these galleries a lot of freedom and opportunity that we didn’t have before.
AFI: On what level is Fountain most different from other art fairs? Is it the artists’ work that is shown or the deletion of selection juries?
DK: I think we are different for the way we go about producing the fair. The galleries that decide to be part of Fountain generally know each other and their artists have more dialogue between themselves during the process of producing the fair. The galleries know that what we are making is a do-it-together project; they know the rewards we can receive from making the fair happen and seeing it done right. The art fairs produce the super majority of income for most galleries, and a successful fair can provide enough fiscal freedom for a small gallery to stabilize it and its artists for the whole year. The galleries we have involved know what the opportunity is and are prepared to do what’s necessary to see the project succeed. I think that sense of community is really what separates us from everyone else.
AFI: Was there a particular moment watching the art fair market that made you determined to organize a new and vastly different one?
DK: Lincoln Capla, my former associate, John Leo, and I all went to Miami in 2005 and the scene was insane. We had been to the Armory and Scope in years previous and had known about the financial benefits that a gallery can receive by being in a fair, but never before had it been so disparagingly obvious. That’s when we first heard of galleries in the neighborhood closing their doors because the business side of showing art called for closing the gallery so that the dealer could concentrate on strictly becoming an art fair venue. Honestly, it was sad. So we approached Melissa McCaig-Welles of McCaig-Welles Gallery Brooklyn and Daniel Aycock of Front Room Brooklyn about doing something to grab the attention of the art collectors, bring them out of the fairs, and try to put them into a friendlier space somewhere between the halls of a convention center and a gallery. We didn’t want galleries to pay outrageous fees to participate in the event, or to fight about where their booth ends and another begins. So we started Fountain. I think Ben La Rocca, the critic from The Brooklyn Rail, said it best when he described art fairs as really the worst way to view art—in a 100-square-foot box where the viewer is overloaded with visual material. That’s why at Fountain we try so hard to maintain real spaces for the galleries. Often when we carve up the fair, we produce exhibition spaces in excess of 500 to 750 square feet, larger then the spaces some of the participating galleries have at their year-round location. It’s more about supporting the galleries and giving them a chance to succeed than trying to make rental money off them.
AFI: How did you feel when The Brooklyn Rail dubbed Fountain “a perfect example of avant-energetics”? Did you feel that you’d achieved what you had originally set out to do for the art world?
DK: Yeah. James Kalm wrote that about NY 2006 and then included us in his review of Miami 2006. I cannot tell you how supportive our critics have been, from the Kalm article, to you guys at Art Fairs International, to Paul H-O at ArtNet, to Jacqueline Lewis at ArtInfo, to ArtKrush and Dazed Digital. Then Flavorpill listed us the hot spot for Armory Weekend in 2007 and we landed in Urban Eye in The New York Times—there is no way to explain how much support that lends to galleries like us, mostly Brooklyn-based spaces like Christina Ray at Glowlab, and Brook and Peer at Outrageous Look, or the Yum Yum Factory. I think the reason for the good press really is due to the relationships galleries and artists develop during the exhibition. I think critics see that and realize the authenticity of what’s happening and they buy into what we are doing in a big way.
AFI: Are there any highlights you could recommend to attendees at Fountain Miami in December?
DK: I can’t let the cat out of the bag, but let’s just say Fountain Miami 2007 will be larger than anything we have taken on before. We will be keeping the galleries to about a dozen and we will have more space, more backing, and more exposure than ever before. We have a lot of return galleries coming back and everyone knows what their part is, how to do it, and the benefit that we get from working together.

